Math? We don't need no stinkin' math! Not to discuss proven principles and what works and doesn't work in society. You don't set the rules here Malodery.
No, it clear you think you do....
|
Math? We don't need no stinkin' math! Not to discuss proven principles and what works and doesn't work in society. You don't set the rules here Malodery.
|
|
|
|
||
|
Math? We don't need no stinkin' math! Not to discuss proven principles and what works and doesn't work in society. You don't set the rules here Malodery.
There is anecdotal evidence that lower taxes, in a case or two, was followed by increased tax revenue but no proof of cause and effect. I gave you proof that it doesn't work just now using income tax as an example. I provided good old BS similar proof using sales tax as an example sometime back. Nobody has challenged my math either time. And, yes, it does require math to prove a number increased or decreased. |
|
|
Math? We don't need no stinkin' math! Not to discuss proven principles and what works and doesn't work in society. You don't set the rules here Malodery.
There is anecdotal evidence that lower taxes, in a case or two, was followed by increased tax revenue but no proof of cause and effect. I gave you proof that it doesn't work just now using income tax as an example. I provided good old BS similar proof using sales tax as an example sometime back. Nobody has challenged my math either time. And, yes, it does require math to prove a number increased or decreased.
|
|
|
Yep, I don't know what "proof" Malodery thinks she/he/it has provided! It's absolutely ridiculous. It's truly like trying to talk with an imbecile. I have not yet found a liberal with any particle of common sense. It's like deja vu all over again! I'm beginning to suspect TP,Mal, et al are posting from some computer in some madhouse. |