Brandstead to raise taxes

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

The Gov. in his great wisdom has proposed a revision in taxes that will lower the Commercial Taxes, and raise residential taxes.  We cannot take any more residential taxes without severely hurting our economy.   Our schools in Muscatine have a HIGH dropout rate, and our city keeps raising spending,  What do the people of this discussion group think we should do?


I believe your premise is inoperative.  The research I've done today indicates that both the Iowa Senate and House will tie any reduction in property taxes for business (including small businesses) to increases in Iowa revenue.  In otherwords, after an initial reduction, any further reductions would be paid for by revenue increases, not by residential property tax increases.  So the "problem" appears to already be solved or will in all probability be solved.  The likelyhood that residential property tax increases will be needed to offset business property tax decreases  appears to be miniscule.  You can verify this yourself by a relatively easy search of the internet.  Next talking point please!


I've asked before, unsuccessfully, how lowering taxes will increase tax revenue.    Go through the math for me.   If you lower the tax by X amount on an industry or individual and how do you get X amount of increased tax revenue?

  • Avatar
  • hiroad
  • Respected Neighbor
  • The Hilltop
  • 5055 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

"If you lower the tax by X amount on an industry or individual and how do you get X amount of increased tax revenue?"

 

You can't be serious, right????  Never had an econ. class, huh?  Never heard of the Laffer curve?

 

I'll assume you really don't know the answer and I'll offer one explanation:  Because the small business (or large business) has less of their income confiscated by the government as taxes, they are able to invest more $ in their business and hire more people.  All these people are now paying taxes, where before they weren't.  Wallah: resulting in more tax revenue.   In addition, because more people are employed, purchases and income is increased across the board.  More people employed = more descretionary spending = increased incomes = more taxes paid. 

 In addition, other tax revenue, besides income tax revenue also increases (gasoline, sales tax, etc., etc.).  It's really a snowball effect.  This has actually been proven in the past.  The reason debt is increased is not because of lack of tax revenue, but  because of overwhelming increases in spending.

When taxes are increased it is an impediment to investment and employment.  There probably is an ideal tax rate that does maximize tax returns, probably somewhere around 20%, but this varies with each particular situation.

One of the worst impediments to investment and resulting employment is uncertainty  for example that generated by a dithering and business and financially ignorant Obumbler.

The Gov. in his great wisdom has proposed a revision in taxes that will lower the Commercial Taxes, and raise residential taxes.  We cannot take any more residential taxes without severely hurting our economy.   Our schools in Muscatine have a HIGH dropout rate, and our city keeps raising spending,  What do the people of this discussion group think we should do?


I see that Republican, in his great wisdom, doesn't know how to spell the Governor's name. 

 

Truly classic.

 

What should we do?  I'd say step one is to continue to ignore boobs like poster Republican. 

 You can't be serious, right????  Never had an econ. class, huh?  Never heard of the Laffer curve?

 

I'll assume you really don't know the answer and I'll offer one explanation:  Because the small business (or large business) has less of their income confiscated by the government as taxes, they are able to invest more $ in their business and hire more people.  All these people are now paying taxes, where before they weren't.  Wallah: resulting in more tax revenue.   In addition, because more people are employed, purchases and income is increased across the board.  More people employed = more descretionary spending = increased incomes = more taxes paid. 

But if this notion was correct, no tax would be the solution, because more people get employed, purchases and income are increased across the board.  More people are employed = more discretionary spending = increased incomes....

 

Or maybe we can agree tax is needed? If so, the question changes to what extent.

 

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow