Muscatine

Never said his word would or should be without challenge. Your assumption there, joey, makes you know what!!!

As for what he said...I posted to you and others many moons ago what liberals had stated about SH and the threat they thought he was. Let's see you hold all those on your side accountable for speaking to the threat of WMDs in Iraq back when your boy was president. We've all seen what they said....were they lying? You...the old pot-kettle-black thing.

At any rate...you liberals were the first to cry about SH and the Iraq threat under Clinton. That fact has remained fact.

Those comments are out of context (most were arguing against the war or during another time before other actions were taken that they thought changed the situation), and any search for fact checkers on that will show that to you, if you really want to know of course.

Also, Bush makes claims beyond what others did.  And he had to insert inappropriately used intel to do it.  Again, different. 

So, once again your just trying to side step responsibility.  Making excuses for the lies Bush told.

It all depends on what your defination of "is" is.

We probably should find out if McCain and Obama can define "is".

That wasn't true for wild Bill either.    The fact is Bush misrepresented what we had and knew, and under his leadership, intel that was doubted and inaccurate was allowed to be presented as if it were good.  That's lying.