Muscatine

InterestingStatistics

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Avatar
  • lionjack
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 544 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

 

This is interesting

 

Whatever your politics, however you lean and however you feel about the current administration, this report is interesting.

As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed Forces is, consider the below statistics:
The annual fatalities, by any cause, of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006:
    1980 2,392 (Carter)
    1981 2,380 (Reagan)
    1984 1,999 (Reagan)
    1988 1,819 (Reagan)
    1989 1,636 (George H W)
    1990 1,508 (George H W)
    1991 1,787 (George H W)
    1992 1,293 (George H W)
    1993 1,213 ( Clinton )
    1994 1,075 ( Clinton )
    1995 2,465 ( Clinton )
    1996 2,318 ( Clinton )
    1997 817 ( Clinton )
    1998 2,252 ( Clinton )
    1999 1,984 ( Clinton )
    2000 1,983 ( Clinton )
    2001 890 (George W)
    2002 1,007 (George W)
    2003 1,410 (George W)
    2004 1,887 (George W)
    2005 919 (George W)
    2006 920 (George W)
    2007 899 (George W)

    Clinton20years (1993-2000): 14,107 deaths
    George W years (2001-2007): 7,932 deaths

Are you surprised when you look at these figures?  They indicate the loss from the two latest Middle East conflicts are less than the loss of military personnel during Clinton 's presidency when America wasn't even involved in a war--unless you include Bosnia and Mogadishu , Somalia . (Remember "Blackhawk Down"?)  Even more surprising is that in 1980, during Carter presidency, there were 2,392 US military fatalities!

These figures appear to indicate many members of our media and politicians pick and choose the information on which they report--that they present only those "facts" that support their agenda.
Consider the latest census of Americans. It shows the following distribution of American citizens by race:

    European descent     69.12 percent
    Hispanic                   12.50 percent
    Black                       12.30 percent
    Asian                        3.70 percent
    Native American        1.00 percent
    Other                        2.60 p ercent

Many members of the media lead us to believe the military death ratio is off balanced compared to the distribution by race in America . Here are the fatalities by race over the past three years in Iraqi Freedom.
    European descent    74.31 percent
    Hispanic                  10.74 percent
    Black                        9.67 percent
    Asian                        1.81 percent
    Native American        1.09 percent
    Other                        0.33 percent

Surprised again?
Hopefully, during the time between now and November, intelligent Americans can decipher--

    the facts from the spin.
    the spinners from the leaders.
    those who seek even more power from those that seek justice.
    the dividers from the uniters.

These statistics are published by the Congressional Research Service and may be confirmed at: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32 492.pdf

"History does not entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." Dwight D. Eisenhower

 

Errrmmm... This is untrue. Check here.

  • Avatar
  • nigel
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 773 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Uh-oh....it looks like you two boys are going to have to arm rassle to see whose source is more believeable. 

  • Avatar
  • lionjack
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 544 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Well, I guess I should have checked this one out but I didn't.  When it had a source to verify this information I just decided it had to be true or why would they tell you where to go to check out this information?  I stand corrected but only in posting an email I had received.  This was not my opinion and if it had been I would have said so.  Now, as far as I know Jesus has not challenged me to arm wrestling or anything else and I do appreciate his setting the issue straight.

One final point  I have seen so many posters argue a point that has political ramifications.  This is done after having read something that someone else has written with no factual knowledge of the veracity of same.  I doubt if anyone can read anything today that is truly factual and completely true.  The only way I know this can happen is for the individual to have lived the event and reported it as fact.  We are left believing that which we want to believe and nothing more.  I will try to check more closely next time.

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_2518034-hot-pizza.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow