|
|
|
|
|
||
|
im not suggesting anything....and big bro and i posted things to show that the dems were talking about wmd's way before bush ever did.....how could bush have lied about wmd's when kerry, kennedy and both clintons and many other dems were out there telling us about iraqs wmd's.... |
|
|
History class 101 for dave to catch up: Based on UN Security Council resolution 1031, NATO was given the mandate to implement the military aspects of the Peace Agreement. A NATO-led multinational force, called the Implementation Force (IFOR), started its mission on 20 December 1995. IFOR was given a one-year mandate. Who were also members of the UN? The US. Who sent US troops to make up the multinational force? Clinton. What was the mission? To enter Bosmia (uninvited) (Dave's definition would call that "invade".); to cause the cesssation of hostilities (war) Between Bosnia and Serbs; separating the armed forces (I think Dave would call that conquer and divide); to transfer areas (take geographic control-again uninvited); move the conquered forces and heavy waepons to approved sites; and continue patrol and inspections. Now if that is not invading and conquering under dave's definition; I don't know what is. So, Clinton sent troops to be used by NATO to invade countries that did nothing to us (under dave's definition). So what was the threat? Seems the threats the democrats listed when Clinton was in office for Iraq far outweigh any threats to the US by Bosnia! Bosnia did nothing to us. Shall I say it slow like you???? get it now? Class over! |
|
|
but now that you've laid out proof and his definition he will either A. change topic or B. change his definition or his take on the definition. |