Muscatine

Here ya go Al:   I guess the abominable snow man is safe for awhile.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece

Misled on global warming.  Why I'm shocked.  Dismayed.   

You know, there are people on this very board who are true believers. 

(Alleged) 2003 NASA Photo of less Arctic Sea Ice.

(Alleged) 1979 NASA Photo of Arctic Sea Ice.

These "space" photos are part of a fraud committed by NASA in a press release and a Goddard Space Center web release to "show" global warming back in 2003.

See whole article for yourself....but consider my questions below first. (I posted this years ago here.): www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory2003/1023/esuice.html

Why do a 1979 photo and a 2003 photo have the exact same clarity and size?

How did NASA get pictures taken at the exact same place with the exact same daylight/spacelight conditions in 1979 and then in 2003?

Were not 1979 photos not as pixel-sharp as digital 2003 photos?

If the satellite cameras from 79 and 03 can photograph surface ice on the seas of Earth; how did they miss the surface ice in the lower Arctic, upper Canada, and over the top in Russia where ice and snow stay year-round? (OOPS!)

This whole thing is a fraud perpetrated by NASA and certain elements of the government, in keeping with anyone else with the agenda of fake global warming. Why do NASA scientists have to go so low for this agenda?

(I didn't know that land ice segments operated under a Romulan cloaking device when satellites fly over them for photos?)

I need no other proof myself. The NASA website (link furnished) and their faked photos did this for me in 2003.

C'mon, Jos...you already posted a long time ago I had them on this one. I still have them. I suspect this will be another post you don't reply to. Make your wife proud, since you brought her up in that other post? You did it; not me.