Muscatine

GTA....Keep in mind that this person who is all about the "facts" has already shown an amazing lack of mastery of them.  This is the person who supposedly spent weeks disproving his/her own claim about some 3 to 1 ratio of scandals.  This is the same person who accused a former poster, probably the only true independent out of us all,  of calling Democratic politicians names, when he hadn't done so, but throws around "names" here without a problem.  This same person claims to be "solidly in the center", but his/her words point other directions. 

If all that points to the "l**r" word, so be it.  We don't know.....all anybody knows about anyone else here is what is written.  He/she can post all he/she wants, as can ol' what's his name.  That's always been the real joy of this place....they can read or ignore my stuff, and I can read or ignore theirs. 

No DM

I read everything I can of yours, in fact I even print out many and send them along. I'm by no means any genius here and I agree with you on many issues::: and like others, you are obviously one of the sharper knives in this drawer. I said who I am and am really tired of this continual referencing. But boys will be boys and grandma warned me about that element of my personality. "You'll be the red headed stepchild, but in the end, you'll be one among many who can honestly hold your head up."

I didn't quote the correct point he made, true. And I did spend a long time reading up on political scandal of America. I did find that the comment was grossly incorrect. The Dems were in fact the naughtiest of the parties. How my admission of that mistake isn't on your record-book I cannot understand. I guess "I told you so" isn't good enough for you. Also that the point he actually made was that within Administrations, the repubs did in fact scandal 3-1. But I admit, I didn't say that then and had to eat crow. But that factual point as well as that I had to be fair and admit I WAS WRONG doesn't seem to be important, only that I said it in the first place and to your satisfaction it echoes still. I'd say also that it does finally show my honesty and purpose. If I were some true Liberal and stood fully against any other points of view, I'd have never admitted I was wrong, but I did. That takes me out of the hypocrite column too and that I am willing to apologize to people even though they are "anonymous words on a screen." Not how I see them but someone else does.

Lucy