Muscatine

No, this was no joke.  I am fully in agreement with the findings of this study.  I see no other legitimate scholarly study that concludes differently.  The author's of this study cited several other previous studies by economists that also concluded similarly that there was a liberal bias in the media.

Instead of nitpicking and taking things out of context, trying to attack my source, why can't you provide a "legitimate" source of your own that comes to a different conclusion?

And I'm not talking about a media conducted or sponsored study of their own bias.   It has to be independent like mine.

I think this is written by some people possibly smarter than me and definitely with more reasearch facilities.

Some exerpts they'v made about the paper you referenced:

But the study employed a measure "bias" so problematic that its findings are next to useless.

In other words the study rests on a presumption that can only be described as bizzare
.

The authors' ignorance comes through in ways large and small.

Professors Groseclose and Milyo have made charges of bias that are among the least substantiated that we have encountered.

.

Study Riddled With Flaws

They go on to give several references to better studies.

Malodery:  You really crack me up!   Media Matters???  Get real.   From their own web site re: who are we:

"Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."

I asked you to come up with an "independent" study like I did that will refute mine.   At best some other University study not sponsored by some liberal cabal.  You came up with something from a liberal talking points web site!      You really are scraping the bottom now aren't you.  

If you can't post a truly independent scholarly study to refute mine, just admit it.   Hilarious