I agree your integrity has always been a issue and that has never changed. As for the user-names, you being a documented liar, how are we to believe you?
|
I agree your integrity has always been a issue and that has never changed. As for the user-names, you being a documented liar, how are we to believe you? |
|
|
|
||
|
Next thing you know big bro, he will be acusing u of being a wally world customer |
|
|
The author's of this study cited several other previous studies by economists that also concluded similarly that there was a liberal bias in the media.
You can find them by the dozens. That doesn't make the conclusion any more valid.
Instead of nitpicking and taking things out of context, trying to attack my source, why can't you provide a "legitimate" source of your own that comes to a different conclusion?
This would be an excercise in futilety. Whatever source I chose, if it didn't find a liberal bias, you would reject it as "liberal". I have invested more time than I should have already.
And I'm not talking about a media conducted or sponsored study of their own bias. It has to be independent like mine.
You call it independent. A couple of guys who work for the CATO institute don't produce an independent study.
|
|
|
So, show me where I presented that I "enjoy" Fox. I won't hold my breath waiting davieboy.
Big Sibling, you're getting awfully demanding these last few posts. Seam to think we all owe you some form of documennted proof of everything we've said or even hinted at. Documented by a conservative source of course. Anything else is a lie.
How about a little "do unto others"?
I don't think you ever did get back to me with the math on how lowering taxes increases revenue. You can limit yourself to sales and property taxes if you like. Income tax (personal and corporate) might be too complicated. |