Muscatine

Funny that you would mention the D.M. Register as supporting your conclusion. I trust their opinions just as much as I trust yours.

Alleged NASA 1979 image of Arctic "Sea Ice".

Alleged NASA 2003 comparative image of Arctic "Sea Ice".

NASA website for above images/report:  http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/1023esuice.html

Questions for Mallcontent:

1. How do photos of the Earth from 1979 and 2003 look exactly the same?

2. How does NASA's cameras from space differentiate between sea ice and land ice. (Noting that the northern-most Yukon territory, Nova Scotia, and northern Russia, along with northern Canada are never without ice/snow/glaciers all year round.) 3.How do the NASA cameras know "sea ice" from "land ice" and "glaciers"; and why are there none shown that we know exist year-round; especially on mountian tops? 

Now; see below, from NASA's website:

Dated March 06, 2010; this photo shows enormous ice all over the land and all over the seas in the Arctic. One can even see the Great Lakes and Alaska for reference.

1. Mallcontent; How can polar-ice/sea-ice be shrinking annually by 9% if NASA's own photos show more ice (land-included) in 2010 than in 1979 and 2003?

2. How does any camera differentiate between snow and ice; especially from space?

Website: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003600/a003698/index.html

Let's see you argue for the flaws NASA has presented in their own glabal-warming websites and "alleged satellite photos"! Good luck...

http://www.petitionproject.org/

BS, I have to think about this.   The question is, is it worth my time to point out your errors given that you will ignore what I write or respond with more errors and perhaps name calling.

Any assurance you're serious?