...
Claude Allegre, a leading French scientist, who was among the first scientists to try to warn people of the dangers of global warming 20 years ago, now believes that “increasing evidence indicates that most of the warming comes of natural phenomena”. Allegre said, “There is no basis for saying, as most do, that the "science is settled." He is convinced that global warming is a natural change and sees the threat of the ‘great dangers’ that it supposedly poses as being bloated and highly exaggerated. Also recently, the President of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Klaus said, when discussing the recent ruling by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that global warming is man-made, “Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it's a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment.” And if you are about to ask why no politicians here seem to be saying this, Klaus offered up an answer, “Other top-level politicians do not express their global warming doubts because a whip of political correctness strangles their voice”. Nigel Calder, the former editor of New Scientist, wrote an article in the UK Sunday Times, in which he stated, “When politicians and journalists declare that the science of global warming is settled, they show a regrettable ignorance about how science works.” He further stated that, “Twenty years ago, climate research became politicised in favour of one particular hypothesis”. And in reference to how the media is representing those who dissent from the man-made theory he stated, “they often imagine that anyone who doubts the hypothesis of man-made global warming must be in the pay of the oil companies”, which is exactly what I believed up until I did my research. He also wrote, “Enthusiasm for the global-warming scare also ensures that heatwaves make headlines, while contrary symptoms, such as this winter’s billion-dollar loss of Californian crops to unusual frost, are relegated to the business pages”.
Claude Allegre is an interesting individual. Over his later years he's made a number of claims that have gone against his earlier beliefs, climate change being one of the topics on which he has changed his mind. However, he's also changed his mind on the dangers of asbestos claiming that asbostos fear is a "form of psychosis invented by leftists" and he's incorrectly claimed that gravity will cause two objects, regardless of mass, to fall at the same rate of speed. When it was pointed out that this was, indeed, incorrect, he steadfastly stood by his claim. A little shaky on the credibility scale if you ask me.
The second link simply points to an article concerning the IPCC's findings.
The third link concerning Klaus provides absolutely no data to corroborate Klaus' statements. Not to mention, Klaus is not a scientist let alone a climatologist of any sort.
Nigel Caulder was a contributor to the aforementioned "Great... Swindle" which has already been debunked. And here is where the names and citations start to intertwine. We'll se Mr. Caulder show up again later.