Muscatine

Hi Bigbro'

I gave the bibliography. It was your desicion to obviously ignore the written history. Or call it lies, fraud, errors, mistakes, false, useless, pointless sad, funny, any or all of the above. It's only non-proof if you don't wish to read them. Of course there's that thing where I admitted I was wrong::: and I was::: though I misquoted the 3-1 issue to start with. But hey, if it makes you feel all grown up and "right", happy landing. Do you like raw fish?

Lucy 

At this point, figure I'd tell my dad he was full of crap, not to make any more outlandish "3 to 1" BS claims, and let it go like I said I would.

Or maybe just quit blaming everything on "dad", have him post here and cut out the middle man.....or woman. 

Bibliography? Apparently you know not what the word means. To have done so, would have meant posting title, date, issue, page, etc., for each discreet allegation you think you found. As I first posted, your effort would be scrutinized and you were challenged for proof. Since none of us here know what particular scandals your "authors and story writers" alledge, how can anyone verify anything from your so-called bibliography?

So....I'll just call what you did as fraudulent. When you first made your claims, you never said you would be posting "numbers". We were waiting for the scandals...and as I posted...I found more scandals under Clinton than your "sources" did. So much for your sources, I guess. Nice try, davie.