We "know" that? I must assume then, that you were a witness. You were there?
Of course, I wasn't there. You can know things that happen when you're not there. That's one advantage of a written language. I'm sure you claim to "know" things that happened outside of your view, hearing and feeling. Do you know Obama was born in Honolulu because you were in the delivery room and then you kept track of that baby's every move since so you're sure he's the same guy? Or do you rely on "sources".
If not, then you are relying on information from "sources", and you've proven here that you only believe liberal sources who meet your criteria. That would make it difficult to "know" anything beyond what you want to believe.
Yes, I got my information from "sources". We all rely on sources. The challenge is to find credible sources. Even your knowledge of the alphabet came from a source. Probably your kindrgarten teacher of maybe first or second grade.
Do you deny the Mi Lai Massacre took place? Do you think there is some doubt?
That group of veterans does not get my respect.
