Once again...I guess if you can't attack the message you attack the messenger.
Some messengers deserve to be attacked.
Everything I heard her say is true.
When you believe everything on Fox is true, then yes, everything she said was. How could it not be?
As far as interrupting and reframing the questions goes, she's just giving the lib press and the libs some of their own medicine and they don't like it because they are not used to it.
I don't know who you consider to be a "lib". I'm guessing everybody who is not on Fox. If that's your criteria, you are not only wrong but indefensably wrong. If you can limit it to people on MSNBC, you'll find Rachel Maddow lets her guests talk without interruption nearly all the time. Probably ten times as much as Hannity.
Another joke by Fox. After the interview, they tell us what the guest really meant by the words that he or she said. It's their way of adding a little more distortion. But the real kicker is when they bring in the person to interpret body language. Then Fox ignores the words of the guest and substitutes whatever words they feel like.
