Muscatine

Senate probe blames top Bush officials for detainee abuses

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Stock
  • chosen
  • Neighbor
  • Iceland, IA
  • 1625 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Neighbor

But, with you posting this in another message, "We're trying to clean up this site...... Be nice."...only proves what I have asserted forever. And that has always been your specific intent at controlling this site and making it what you think it should be.

LOL......... We would be that dude in Denver enforcing the rules and me doing my part by being respectful... And yes that has always been my intent.

As for name calling.... What happens when you are wrong in your assumptions and create trouble for other people?


I don't ever recall being wrong. If I'm ever wrong that dude in Denver would make the call.

 And you have never followed Bush.

Yes I have......... For eight very long years

 

  • Avatar
  • davisjoe
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Mason City, IA
  • 145 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

 

You must be right Professor.  Those terrorist fellows are unbeatable.  Invulnerable.  Unstoppable.  No way to beat them.  Too many of them.  They're everywhere.

You are in awe of them, and that is troubling. 

Not what I said.  I said they are not beatable by invading countries or bombing any specific country.  How we do something matters.  Being reckless and illogical is not helpful.  Instead, I would point to how the British eventually dealt with their irish problem.  Quietly they worked out deals with moderates and quietly rounded up the worse Irish terrorist.  This took away the ability of the Irish to use propaganda against the British and effectively worked out a peaceful resolution.  It is not wrong to use our heads a bit.  Some people actually priase being smart.  Wink

  • Avatar
  • davisjoe
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Mason City, IA
  • 145 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

 

Go figure....I'm still waiting for proof Bush lied. You nor your brother have never been able to provide that to this day.

You have to take your hands from over your eyes and actually read.  When you use intel you know to be troubled, like Feith did with his inappropriate use of intel (he worked for Cheney who worked for the President), and present this doubted intel as if it were the gospel, well, any reasonable person would call that lying. 

But then to now speak to some doctrine of Powell's when joe called him a liar on this site is a little bit skewed!

I challenge you to find where I called him a liar, not that it would matter to the point.  A person can lie, and still have a valid point on something else.  But I can show you if you like where Powell has called the intel information given him crap, and that he harbors bad feelings with those he believes lied to him.

 

But again, not the point.  So, your strawman effort here again fails to mean anything.  But that is the nature of strawmen.  Strawmen are often used when the arguer can't really effectively dispute the point.  So I accept your concession.  Wink

  • Avatar
  • darylmaxen
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 982 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Ah-haaaa....I see now.  We're going to negotiate a victory.  Yes, that will work quite nicely with these civilized moderates who cut off heads and fly airplanes into buildings.  It's all about propaganda, after all. 

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow