Muscatine

You should talk to liberals, whoever they are, when they make this argument.  However, you're talking to me.  Powell was quite upset over the misinformation given him.  If you want to talk about Fieth's inappropriate use of intel, how Cheney's office used this to misrepresent the over all intel, we can.  But strawmen like your response really don't help much in any argument.

Go figure....I'm still waiting for proof Bush lied. You nor your brother have never been able to provide that to this day. But then to now speak to some doctrine of Powell's when joe called him a liar on this site is a little bit skewed!

And....you never answered my question. And you have never followed Bush.

But, with you posting this in another message, "We're trying to clean up this site...... Be nice."...only proves what I have asserted forever. And that has always been your specific intent at controlling this site and making it what you think it should be. Does this line mean that we will not be seeing you use the word "hate" towards another person anymore on this message board? Just asking?

That's quite an admission there...but I like the fact that you have now, proven me right. Who is the we in "we're" anyway? You definitely included yourself.

As for name calling.... What happens when you are wrong in your assumptions and create trouble for other people?

http://www.nouspace.net/john/ez/writing/index.html   

You can visit this website and clearly see where I was coming from in my post to staunchley. I never called anyone any names. I was addressing his bad grammar. Now the record is straight. Next time you pull out that dictionary, you better know the intent of the writer, because you libeled me here on December 10th with your defamation and false accusation.

Again I ask you, where is the right place?  As there are different groups, no head to cut off, located all around the world, finding that exact place would seem hard.  Terrorism is a tactic, not a place or a person.  No nation attacked us.  No army is fighting us.  There are no generals and no head of state that speaks for the whole.  Again, it would be like if we bombed that place that would make you surrender, it would mean little to the others, and the problem would continue. 

As for killing out way out of this, well, there are too many.  They are not centrally located anywhere, and we create new ones each time we act recklessly.  Again, it is not like fighting a acountry. If you cannot see the differences, you will never see the the problems or the possible solutions.  Instead, you meanly ensure an endless conflict.

You must be right Professor.  Those terrorist fellows are unbeatable.  Invulnerable.  Unstoppable.  No way to beat them.  Too many of them.  They're everywhere.

You are in awe of them, and that is troubling.