Muscatine

history of gun control

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

After reading the following historical facts, read the part about Switzerland twice
A LITTLE GUN HISTORY In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1..5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated..
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens
Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens.'
Without them, we are 'subjects'.
During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.
The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!
SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
I'm a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment! Just think how powerful our government is getting!

  • Avatar
  • nigel
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 773 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Great post Mobe.  I'll bet Switzerland doesn't have nearly the problem with illegal immigration that we have, either.

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

After reading the following historical facts, read the part about Switzerland twice
I'm a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment! Just think how powerful our government is getting!

 

Questions:

1.   Where does this come from?

2.   What is meant by gun control?   Registration?   Confiscation?   Limits on numbers?   Limits on types?   Limits on clip size?  Storage requirements?   License fees?   Restrictions on who can own them?   I doubt all the countries you mention had the same controls.

3.   Can anybody possibly defend all the assertions made?

 

Switzerland has gun controls.   No confiscation but controls.

 

In Uganda, guns would have only made the massacre greater.   Much of the killing was done by cutlesses, guns would have been more efficient.   I suspect it would have been similar in a lot of the other places.

 

  • Avatar
  • hiroad
  • Respected Neighbor
  • The Hilltop
  • 5055 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

"In Uganda, guns would have only made the massacre greater.   Much of the killing was done by cutlesses, guns would have been more efficient."

 

Is this just an uninformed opinion, or can you substantiate that?  My opinion is that guns in the hands of those being attacked probably would have saved lives by stopping the cutlass wielders!  Using your logic, we would also have to say that guns in the hands of cops cause more deaths!!

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow