Muscatine

Did you mean the US *IS* fighting in Pakistan with your illiterate statement, davieboy?

I would have thought you would have posted a little proof with this absolute statement of yours. The US troops in Pakistan are not there engaged in war, battle, or fighting. They are on assistance missions and are allowed to defend themselves.

The following is from your brother Joe's favorite source, The NY Times. So I know it has credence for you:

"The soldiers were among at least 60 to 100 members of a Special Operations team that ***trains *** Pakistan’s paramilitary Frontier Corps in counterinsurgency techniques, including intelligence gathering and development assistance."

------------------------------------------

The only act of aggression, brainiac, has been commited by nobama on this most recent drone attack into their country. We are not at war in or with Pakistan, which is the whole point to this post. Please stay on topic.

BTW...you never addressed the comment you made when you posted something to the effect that a post you made was "not bad for the little bus guy", or some such. You have never explained that comment that came totally out of the blue. Care to explain it now, and, is there any connection to that statement and your responses here?

Additionally, you must be getting worked to death at weirdmart again. You have not posted since 5:19 am on the 3rd. Last time you went missing you posted that you work for a living.....guess you are being worked to death for a living?

US troops are not engaged in "WAR" anywhere. They're engaged in battle, conflict, military actions, or even a "peace keeping mission". However it's not officially a war.

I can provide links to prove what I say, but you haven't challenged anything I've said. Therefore I see no need....

Funny, commie, davieboy...how the word "war" ends up in the very same article you post. And to say I have not challenged anything you have *posted*; (not said, davieboy)!, is a little insane.

To say US troops are not engaged in war anywhere; and then post a link to an article that uses the very word is the insanity I shall demonstrate. You might want to engage the troops on this matter. You might want to also engage your own step son on this matter.

Please describe where the authorization for a drone strike into Pakistan comes from, brainiac, from the small bus of your world (your words; yet undefined).

This makes everything Bush did ok; by your defense here! Can you please define the battles and conflicts they were sent to Pakistan for, daviegirl? None exist. If US troops are not engaged in "war"; then Bush sending troops anywhere was not illegal and he cannot be impeached for it. (Oh, wait...he could not be impeached anyway!...and he wasn't!!!!!!!)

Again...Bush was wrong how?....if nobama is right here, as you describe? Show us the comparisons, please, that cause you to make these determinations!

Remember, Bush sent troops to Pakistan too.....only not to engage in war, battle, fighting, etc. Please remember, your posted link used the word "war"! (Dummy!)

Remember.....you posted we are on the right track!!!!!