Muscatine

Revisit old subject-Separation of church-state

Posted in: Muscatine

IF it were to be suddenlly allowed, what would be the outcry if a group of Muslims were to start indoctronating the Christian kids. I suspect it would not be pretty. It is a non issue as I see it.


I've always wondered what would be the reaction if the teacher said "Alright students, it's time to pray, take out your prayer rugs and face Mecca"


As long as it is fair and open to all, why would mallory have a problem with it? The fact is in your offering..."if it were to be suddenly allowed"! Who denied it, but liberals?

IF it were to be suddenlly allowed, what would be the outcry if a group of Muslims were to start indoctronating the Christian kids. I suspect it would not be pretty. It is a non issue as I see it.


I've always wondered what would be the reaction if the teacher said "Alright students, it's time to pray, take out your prayer rugs and face Mecca"

why are the libs and athiests so afraid of GOD?


Athiests don't fear God.   To them there is no such thing as God.


And that is what I posted, mallcontent! If there is no such thing...then why do they have issues on who and where God is worshipped? Just asking! You missed the point again...please keep up!

BS,

There is no double standard.   It is a creation of your imagination. 

Prisoners and students have the same rights.

 

If a government prison or any of its employees issues (by issue, I presume it is bought by the government) religious material to prisoners, it is wrong.

If government employees lead prisoners in prayer or other religious observances, it is wrong.

The government would be establishing religion where there may have been none before

 

If government allows someone else to provide religious material to prisoners or allows prisoners to pray or conduct their own religious services that's fine if they treat all religions alike.  They do have the right to regulate it for reasons of safety and not let it interfere with the missioin of the prison.

 

If a government school, or any of its employees provides religious materal to students, it is wrong.   If government employees lead students in prayer or other religious observances, it is wrong.

The government would be establishing religion where there may have been none before.

 

If the government allows someone else to provide religious material to students or allows students to pray or conduct their own religious services that's fine if they treat all religions alike.   They do have the right to regulate it for reasons of safety and not let it interfere with the mission of the school.


It's not my argument, davieboy! So it is not MY imagination. And you don't get to answer for others; so I win again!

 

Everything you try to cite as examples have nothing to do with the establishment clause of the Constitution...just as I have pointed out your error before! Congress had made no such law. You lose! Leading prayer by Gov't. employees (your example), is not Congressestablishing a law, if Gov't. did that! (That is only your opinion.)

 

Likewise...what you assert about schools is NOT Congress establishing a law! What law did Congress establish? This is the third time I have asked you liberals! Schools furnishing religious materials is NOT establishing a Congressional law! What law was established by Congress?

 

You liberals lose every time! Because, by the text of the establishment clause of the Constitutionthat you, davie, brought up here, does not  reflect any law  related to this issue! No law has been created as such...therefore, I have not imagined anything....but liberals have, in their interpretation of such! Thanks for not denying that such double standard exists...and thanks for acknowledging that no law has ever been created by Congress. Therefore; it must be OK.

 

Now...tell us why, davieboy, our free kids can't freely enjoy their individual religions in our schools or anywhere; but terrorist prisoners can in government funded and operated prisons! If you can answer and justify this; you will be a world scholar! The challenge has been issued!

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

IF it were to be suddenlly allowed, what would be the outcry if a group of Muslims were to start indoctronating the Christian kids. I suspect it would not be pretty. It is a non issue as I see it.


I've always wondered what would be the reaction if the teacher said "Alright students, it's time to pray, take out your prayer rugs and face Mecca"


As long as it is fair and open to all, why would mallory have a problem with it? The fact is in your offering..."if it were to be suddenly allowed"! Who denied it, but liberals?

You continually admonish us to "keep up" and then you give us mish-mash like this and exspect us to interpret or maybe just guess at the correct meaning.
Tell me what "it" refers to in the four places you use it.   And tell me what the "fact"is.
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow