Muscatine

Thank you, logic. Only to the degree of *knowingly* allowing illegal operation....and only to the degree that your statement was wrong as written, due to your newly discovered caveat for it. You did not know your statement was wrong in its blanket; all-encomapssing form until my post. Now you have the selective elements to apply, as I have furnished you. You are now properly educated. So, again, your blanket statement was wrong as an all-encompassing statement on that particular part of the code, since the law does in fact exist and extend to the owner, as provided. Case closed.

Geez, ok now go pat yourself on the back.

Still does not change the fact that my given situation and yours were very different and in mine the law is/would not be extended to the owner and yours would.

 In Citrus county Florida a traffic light violation is $ 231.00 and I have no idea if that is state or county law.

Let go of the "situation" argument, logic. May I remind you that there was no "situation" when you posted the blatant statements that Iowa law does not extend to registered owners regarding red light violations?

Quote: "As with all other vehicle violations the citation is issued to the driver, not the owner.  Iowa law requires the driver of a motor vehicle to be in compliance with the law, it does not extend to the owner of the vehicle."

You have merely tried to defend what you understood at that time via an umbrella statement. At that time, your statements were, and are, wrong. My only point... in my initial response to your post. You may also keep the condescending comments to yourself, please. This is not personal and I have never made such comments to you in this post.