Muscatine

Hiroad....I think I've finally figured this out.  After months of trying to figure out how the poster called "Mallory" produces these illogical, irrational, irrelevant, and otherwise wacky thinking points, it has all become crystal clear.  She is a NIACC grad, schooled in the art of faulty reasoning by Professor Joe.  It all fits. 

Sit back and enjoy.  It will only get better, but is less sad if we remember that most of us grow out of our liberal college brain-washing, and she might too. 

I already did.  I provided it on Sept 23, 8:50 pm.   It was page 4 of "Rasmussen Polls".   It showed Rasmussen gave more favorable percentages to Republicans in seven out the seven polls for which another poll was taken within a few days before or after.

You, of course, didn't like it and either ignored or rejected it.

You said "consistently" biased.  

The reference you furnished has:

1.  No relativity to "consistency"

2.  Rasmussen, sticking with their standard poll population base of "likely voters", is not a "bias".  It is a logical selection in order to get a predictive trend measure of voting outcome.

Your posts really are getting rather Wacko!

In reality, her posts are getting even MORE Wacko.