You said Rasmussen was "consistently" biased.
Yes, words to that effect. And they are.
Now you are talking about how their poll result compares to seven other polls of entirely different populations.
I was always talking about this. Different populations but intending to measure the same thing. Voter sentiment.
1. I would say, rather than consistent, Rasmussen is inconsistent with the other polls you mention.
Agreed, but consistently in the same direction. Biased.
2. The most often used meaning of the word implies a sameness over a period of time.
Agreed.
I say once again, that Rasmussen does not present the same results over time.
Agreed. But this has nothing to do with what I said. I'm not even sure what you are trying to say here. Of course, over time results will vary.
3. If you are not wacko, you are somewhat ignorant.
I like to leave the name calling in.
If Ricky Stanzi throws his first seven passes for completions, that's constincy.
If Albert Puhols goes seven for seven in a game, that's consistancy.
If Rasmussens polls give more favorable results to Republicans in seven out seven comparisons to other polls, that's consistency.
And shows bias.