Muscatine

Marriage

Posted in: Muscatine

Don't listen to him Mobe.  He's one of those guys watching you through the computer screen. 

 

In fact, all diverse sexual preferences become part of this discussion by their very nature.  Those who wish to legitimize  homosexuality are uncomfortable with the notion that other forms of deviant behavior will also then need to be considered acceptable.  We surely can't allow on without allowing others.  It then becomes the job of the government, representing the people, to decide on boundaries and limits, and the punishments for law-breakers.  I merely ask you to put yourself into that role, and tell us what age is too young, what animal is too dangerous, how low the legal alcohol limit needs to go.....all to make the liberals feel good about themselves for not treading on anyone's rights to "be themselves". 

 

 


No disrespect Daryl, but why ask for sometime you find yourself unwilling to answer? I'm merely asking you to put yourself into the role, and tell us what age is too young, what animal is too dangerous, how low the legal alcohol limit needs to go.....

 

  • Avatar
  • hiroad
  • Respected Neighbor
  • The Hilltop
  • 5055 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

"so how does a piece of paper change the family unit!"

 

Looks like you have short term memory problems, Mobay.  Go back and read some of the early posts in this thread for an explanation of how gay marriage will (and has in Scandinavia) harmed the traditional family unit.

 

And, by the way, all kinds of "behavior" has been regulated since the beginning of civilization.  It's called legislation based on moral principles.

 

And....(it seems a waste of time to keep pointing this out)...but switching words for "negro" is fallacious logic.  Race is not the same as behavior.  Apples and oranges.

  • Avatar
  • darylmaxen
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 982 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

What worries me is that you've been posting here for so long, I can actually almost understand your first sentence.

 

So....

 

18.

All animals too dangerous (or just too weird)

.06

No same gender marriages.

 

Anything else?

 

Your turn.  Of course, if you do set limits, there's a whole other issue. 

 

And if you set no limits, that's a whole different ballpark.

LOL on my writing.

With the exception of Same Sex Marriages (SSM) we are close in agrement. Hardly worth a discussion or thought.

So on the topic of SSM, what grounds would you deny a person their freedoms.

In age of consent we're protecting the innocents of youth. In animals we're protecting the animal who clearly does not have a choice. In blood content and driving we're protecting unexpecting people of the danager. In SSM the people are two consenting adults that don't infringe on any of your rights. It appears your argument is strickly sexual bias.

 

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_2518034-hot-pizza.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow