Muscatine

Marriage

Posted in: Muscatine

C'mon comparing pedophiles to gay rights really. were talking consenting adults not criminal activity. it's ridiculous for free people in a free country to oppress other people because they don't like what they do. you might want to leave muscatine and explore this great country, because there is a lot going on out there that you don't see around here. they are people too they want the same things normal people want. life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. even if you and god think it's wrong it's their choice not yours or the governments. that is part of freedom excepting all freedoms even the ones you don't like!!!!


Mobman; The first clue (flaw) in your statement is the use of the words "normal people". Your freudian slip asserts that you too, think gays are not normal.

Okay Mobe.  What age is an adult?  It differs from state to state.  Anywhere from 16 to 21.  And for purposes of sex, pedophiles want that number lowered way, way down.  So how low do you want to go?  14 okay?  12 too much?  15 out of line?  9?  I mean heck, it's "their choices".  Are we going to let them make the call?  Just because we don't like what they do, can we tell them how to live their lives?


Iowa's age of consent is 14 for certain things.

C'mon Mobay.....give the rambling a rest for just a moment and focus.  What age is too young? Somebody has to make the call, or it's open season on the kiddies. 

No Mobay.... Keep the topic on the subject matter. Gay rights should not be linked to pedophiles in an attempt to distract. If Daryl is in such a hurry to discuss the proper age of consent, let him start his own thread and actually offer his opinion on the matter. He is only seeking to ridicule and shows no desire for adult discussion.

 


Davie...you guys lost the election that showed overwhelmingly that judges deciding *for* gay marriage were shown the door. If you don't like the common moral attitude in Iowa, that's your problem.

LOL on my writing.

With the exception of Same Sex Marriages (SSM) we are close in agrement. Hardly worth a discussion or thought.

So on the topic of SSM, what grounds would you deny a person their freedoms.

In age of consent we're protecting the innocents of youth. In animals we're protecting the animal who clearly does not have a choice. In blood content and driving we're protecting unexpecting people of the danager. In SSM the people are two consenting adults that don't infringe on any of your rights. It appears your argument is strickly sexual bias.

 

How about "innocence" and "danger"?

 

Quote: "In SSM the people are two consenting adults that don't infringe on any of your rights."  How about Daryl's right to living in the type of moral community he wants to be in; where the common majority does not wish to have same sex marriages amongst them?

See how easy it is for you to miss the rights of those others while you are caught up with your liberal agenda, davie?

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow